Legal Opinion

In re: Ian Nehemiah Gray and Cynthia Jackson Gray

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 9, 2014No. BAP AZ-13-1502-JuKiD; Bankruptcy 3:13-bk-8071-MCWPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JURY, Bankruptcy Judge.

Chapter 7 debtors 1 Ian and Cynthia Gray appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order sustaining the chapter 7 trustee’s objection to an amended exemption on the grounds of bad faith. Because the Supreme Court in Law v. Siegel, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 1188, 188 L.Ed.2d 146 (2014), determined that bankruptcy courts have no discretion either to disallow amended exemptions or to deny leave to amend exemptions based on equitable grounds not specified in the Bankruptcy Code, we VACATE and REMAND.

I. FACTS

Ian and Cynthia Gray (Debtors) filed their chapter 7 petition and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Law v. SiegelSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Tammy Phillips v. Kevan GilmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Marchand v. Whittick (In re Whittick)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
  3. In re LuaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2015
  4. In re PadulaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
  5. In re SaldanaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2015

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API