State v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Matt. G. Reynolds, Judge. There is nothing before this court except the record proper, which contains no error. On April 10, 1906, the defendant was tried and convicted. Her motion for a new trial was promptly filed and continued till the next term. At the next term her motion for a Pew trial was overruled. Her motion in arrest was then filed; and said motion was continued till the next term.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Matt. G. Reynolds, Judge. There is nothing before this court except the record proper, which contains no error. On April 10, 1906, the defendant was tried and convicted. Her motion for a new trial was promptly filed and continued till the next term. At the next term her motion for a Pew trial was overruled. Her motion in arrest was then filed; and said motion was continued till the next term. No. bill of exceptions was filed at the term at which the motion for a new trial was overruled, neither was leave then given to file a bill in the future.…
1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.
This is an appeal from a sentence of the circuit court of the city of St. Louis.
The defendant was prosecuted by information, duly verified, filed by the circuit attorney of said city. She was duly arraigned and pleaded not guilty. A trial was had on April 10,1906, and resulted in her conviction and sentence to the penitentiary.
The information charged the defendant with the larceny of seventy-five dollars from the person of one Reuthinger in the nighttime. After the verdict of guilty defendant filed her motion for a new trial, which was continued to the next term. At the next term the motion…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. LarewSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- State v. GoehlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- State v. HarrounSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. AmmonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909