State v. Ammons
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. C. Orrick Bishop, Judge. (1) No order extending the time to the December term was made at the term during which the motion for new trial was overruled, and the filing of the bill of exceptions at the subsequent term does not preserve the action of the court in overruling the motion for new trial, and nothing can be considered here but the record proper.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. C. Orrick Bishop, Judge. (1) No order extending the time to the December term was made at the term during which the motion for new trial was overruled, and the filing of the bill of exceptions at the subsequent term does not preserve the action of the court in overruling the motion for new trial, and nothing can be considered here but the record proper. State v. Goehler, 193 Mo. 177; State v. Larew, 191 Mo. 192; State v. Harroun, 199 Mo. 258; State v. Jackson, 209 Mo. 398. (2) The jury having found defendants guilty, it became the duty, and was…
1Opinion of the CourtGantt, P. J.
This prosecution was begun on the 5th day of June, 1906, by the circuit attorney of the city of St. Louis, by an information duly verified and filed in the office of the clerk of the circuit court for criminal causes. The defendants were arrested and duly arraigned.
On November 1, 1906, the defendants were put on trial before ¿ jury and were each convicted of an assault with intent to kill as charged in the information and the jury further found that each of the defendants was under the age of eighteen years. In due time they filed their motions for a new trial, which were overruled on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. LarewSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- State v. GoehlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- State v. HarrounSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908