Legal Opinion
Bronia, Inc. v. Seo Young Ho
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 20, 1995No. 91 Civ. 1493 (WCC)PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge.
This case arises under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (“PACA”), which creates statutory trusts in favor of unpaid sellers of perishable goods. Plaintiffs are unpaid sellers seeking trust benefits totalling $191,180.56 from the defendant Seo Young Ho in his capacity as the sole shareholder, officer, and director of Tradefield Produce Corporation (“Tradefield”). Before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on their claims of liability against Seo. For the reasons set forth below, we grant the motion with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Meckel v. Continental Resources Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Morris Okun, Inc. v. Harry Zimmerman, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Phillips v. Riverside, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1992
- Capital Data Corp. v. Capital National BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- SUNKIST GROWERS, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael S. FISHER and Meryle Fisher, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Coosemans Specialties, Inc. v. GargiuloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Golman-Hayden Co. v. Fresh Source Produce Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Coach, Inc. v. Horizon Trading USA Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Chrysler v. GuineyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.