Legal Opinion

State v. Clay

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 1975No. 35736PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUNN, Judge.

Defendant-appellant appeals from a denial, without hearing, of his Rule 27.26, V. A.M.R. motion to vacate convictions based on pleas of guilty to first degree murder and two separate counts of robbery. The core issues which we consider are whether defendant’s 27.26 motion states facts which, if true, would entitle him to relief and whether the record made at the time of the guilty pleas refutes defendant’s Rule 27.26 contentions, thereby negating the necessity of an evidentiary hearing by the trial court. We affirm the decision of the trial court.

On February 26, 1968, defendant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Fontaine v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  5. Hogshooter v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  2. Taylor v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Achter v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Jackson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Pouncil v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API