Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1976No. 36845PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENDLEN, Judge.

Appeal from denial of Rule 27.26, V.A. M.R. motion seeking to vacate a murder second degree conviction and fifteen year sentence entered on a plea of guilty. The contentions of error concern the trial court’s failure to hold an evidentiary hearing.

At the outset we note that except for the most liberal construction the trial court could not have found the allegations in appellant’s motion sufficient to state a claim for relief under Rule 27.26. It has been held that “[a] 27.26 movant, in order to be entitled to an evidentiary hearing, must plead facts, not conclusions, which, if…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  4. Skaggs v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  5. Maxwell v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rice v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  2. Gilliland v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  4. White v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Davis v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API