Legal Opinion

GLATMAN v. Valverde

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 2006No. G036880PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IKOLA, J.

The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), George Valverde, DMV director, and R. Sammartino, a DMV hearing officer (collectively, appellants), appeal after a superior court judge issued a writ commanding the DMV to set aside its suspension of Brent Allen Glatman’s driver’s license. Appellants contend the court erred by finding the results of Glatman’s blood test were not timely recorded, as required by Evidence Code section 1280, subdivision (b). We affirm.

FACTS

On July 24, 2005, Officer J. Baggs stopped Glatman for speeding on Pacific Coast Highway and observed Glatman exhibited…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lake v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Davenport v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. S. C. Anderson, Inc. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Yordamlis v. ZolinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Molenda v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Miyamoto v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Kincaid v. KincaidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Coe v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Petrus v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API