Legal Opinion

Minix v. Gonzales

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided March 3, 2005No. 14-04-00344-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

162 S.W.3d 635 (2005)

Paul MINIX, Appellant,

v.

Paul GONZALES, Curtis Pitts, and Layla Wuttke, Appellees.

No. 14-04-00344-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.).

March 3, 2005.

Paul Minix, Navasota, appellant pro se.

Panel consists of Chief Justice HEDGES and Justices HUDSON and FROST.

MAJORITY OPINION

ADELE HEDGES, Chief Justice.

Paul Minix appeals from the dismissal of his lawsuit against Paul Gonzales, Curtis Pitts, and Layla Wuttke. In his petition, Minix, an inmate at a state correctional facility, alleged that Gonzales, also an inmate, violated the Texas Open Records Act by unlawfully…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corporation v. AuldTexas Supreme Court · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API