Legal Opinion

Tugendhaft v. Country Estates Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 17, 1985PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.), dated August 22, 1983, as, upon their motion to excuse their default and to require plaintiff to accept their answer, directed plaintiff to accept defendants’ answer only on the issue of damages, and limited any trial of the action to that issue.

Order reversed, insofar as appealed from, as a matter of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and motion granted in its entirety, on condition that defendants personally…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parochial Bus Systems, Inc. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Lincoln v. AusticAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Stolpiec v. WienerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Junior v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. Heffney v. Brookdale Hospital CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Murphy v. D. V. Waste Control Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Paradiso & Associates, Inc. v. TamarinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Ubaydov v. Kenny's Fleet Maintenance, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Gang Liang Guo v. ShaybaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Galante v. County of NassauNew York Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API