Crescendo Investments, Inc. v. Brice
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by:
TOM RICKHOFF, Justice.
In eleven appellate issues, Crescendo Investments, Inc. and the other named plaintiffs (hereinafter “Crescendo” collectively) challenge the sufficiency of the evidence, and complain the trial court erred in granting a directed verdict, resolving conflicting jury answers, five evidentiary rulings, failing to give an instruction regarding spoliation of evidence, refusing to allow the substitution of certain parties, and granting an award of costs. Finally, Crescendo raises a cumulative error issue. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural History
The plaintiffs were the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Federal Sign v. Texas Southern UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Financial Review Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
- Szczepanik v. First Southern Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
- Spencer v. Eagle Star Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Indian Beach Property Owners' Ass'n v. Linden, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- In Re Enron Corp. Sec., Derivative & ERISA Lit.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
- Westchester Fire Insurance Co. v. Admiral Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Sterling Trust Co. v. AdderleyTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- City of San Antonio v. El Dorado Amusement Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.