Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Clark v. Hillebrandt

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 4, 1963No. 46497PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCALEB, Justice.

The question presented for decision in this case is whether or not a suitor in forma pauperis may secure the attendance of witnesses subpoenaed by him without first depositing with the clerk of court a sum of money sufficient to pay all fees and expenses to which the witnesses are entitled by law.

Relator, having been authorized by the Fourteenth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Calcasieu to prosecute his suit against Cit-Con Oil Corporation et al. in forma pauperis, requested Acton Hille-brandt, clerk of said court, to cause subpoenas to issue for the personal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hartford v. MobleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  2. State ex rel. Clark v. HillebrandtLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Doyal v. Roosevelt HotelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Naquin v. Iberia Parish School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. State ex rel. Aucoin v. BlakemanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. National Dairy Products Corp. v. Louisiana Milk CommissionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API