In Re Last Will and Testament of Melson
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the CourtWalsh, Justice
(for the majority):
In this appeal from the Court of Chancery, we examine the question of who should bear the burden of persuasion on claims of undue influence and lack of testamentary capacity in a will contest proceeding. The Court of Chanceiy placed the burden on the contestant, notwithstanding that the proponent, the testatrix’s son, drafted the will and was its principal beneficiary. Although earlier Delaware authorities spoke ambiguously in this respect, we now hold that, under the circumstances of this case, the burden of persuasion lay with the drafter/beneficiary.
I
Viola Melson…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Rizzo v. RizzoIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
- Nardo v. NardoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
- Estate of ReichelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Looney v. Estate of WadeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Hiler v. CudeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hudak v. ProcekSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
- Mullin v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Sloan v. SegalSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
- Andrew Mullin v. Brown Chapa Fields LindenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Charles B. Kelley, Jr. v. Procino-Wells & Woodlan, LLC and Julie S. DeckerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2025
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.