Legal Opinion

Miglionico v. Birmingham News Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 7, 1979No. 78-59, 78-59X and 78-62PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

378 So.2d 677 (1979)

Nina MIGLIONICO et al.

v.

The BIRMINGHAM NEWS COMPANY.

The BIRMINGHAM NEWS COMPANY

v.

Nina MIGLIONICO et al.

CITY OF BIRMIGNHAM et al.

v.

The BIRMINGHAM NEWS COMPANY.

78-59, 78-59X and 78-62.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

September 14, 1979.

As Corrected on Denial of Rehearing December 7, 1979.

John S. Foster, Birmingham, for appellants and cross-appellees Nina Miglionico, David Herring, Russell Yarbrough, E. C. Overton, Richard Arrington, Jr., and Bessie S. Estell.

John P. Carlton and Charles E. Clark, Birmingham, for appellants City of Birmingham and David Vann, Mayor.

James C. Barton and…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Beatty; Concurrence · Almon.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Schmidt v. LessardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Laman v. McCordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. DeArman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  5. Lipscomb v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. WATER WORKS AND SEWER BOARD OF SELMA v. RandolphSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Common Council of Peru v. Peru Daily Tribune, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Brown's Ferry Waste Disposal v. TrentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Grein v. Board of EducationNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Slawson v. Alabama Forestry Com'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API