Legal Opinion
Rosario v. Loomis Puerto Rico
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided August 18, 2022No. 3:19-cv-02095Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO PEDRO ROSARIO Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 19-2095 (FAB) LOOMIS PUERTO RICO, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. Defendant Loomis Puerto Rico (“Loomis”) moves for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 (“Rule 56”). (Docket No. 42.) Plaintiff Pedro Rosario (“Rosario”) also moves for summary judgment. (Docket No. 49.) For the reasons set forth below, Loomis’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and Rosario’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED. (Docket Nos. 42 and 49.) I. Background1…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.