Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Edgcomb

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1912No. 9789PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Neal, J., entered March 7, 1911, dismissing an action for the dissolution of a partnership and for an accounting, after a trial on the merits to the court.

1Per curiam

The appellant, plaintiff below, brought this action against the respondent for an accounting. In the complaint he alleged that, for more than twelve years last past, the respondent and himself had associated together as partners, and that a partnership existed between them to deal in certain mining properties located in British Columbia, in the vicinity of Portland Canal; that he contributed the sum of $3,000 in cash to the enterprise, and the respondent contributed thereto certain options which he had theretofore obtained upon properties in that locality; that the respondent subsequently…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barovic v. ConstantiWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State Ex Rel. Melbye v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API