Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 2003No. 82A01-0203-CR-89PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Timothy Miller and the State bring this consolidated interlocutory appeal pursuant to Indiana Appellate Rule 14(B) and raise two issues for review:

1. Whether the trial court erred when it determined that Miller's 1998 conviction for Operating a Vehicle While Intoxicated ("OWI"), as a Class A misdemeanor, was void as a matter of law.

2. Whether the trial court erred when it determined that Indiana Criminal Rule 4(C) does not bar further proceedings on the charge that resulted in the void 1998 OWI conviction.

We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. Moss-DwyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Vermillion v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Norlund v. FaustIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Continental Basketball Ass'n v. Ellenstein Enterprises, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Debro v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Debro v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Debro v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API