Legal Opinion
Giorgio Foods, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 6, 2013No. Slip Op. 13-29; Court 03-00286PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANCEU, Judge:
This case arose from decisions of two agencies, the U.S. International Trade Commission (the “ITC” or the “Commission”) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”), denying plaintiff monetary benefits under the now-repealed Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA” or “Byrd Amendment”), 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000). 1 . The ITC determined that Giorgio Foods, Inc. (“Giorgio”), a domestic producer of preserved mushrooms, did not qualify for “affected domestic producer” (“ADP”) status, which a domestic producer must obtain in order to receive CDSOA…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Trusted Integration, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Giorgio Foods, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Giorgio Foods, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015