Legal Opinion

Stalcup v. Stalcup.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1904PublishedCited by 6 opinions

ActioN by T. T. Stalcup against W. E. Stalcup and others, beard by Judge B. F. Long, at August Term, 1904, of tbe Superior Court of Cherokee County. From a judgment for the defendants tbe plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff, who is tbe only child and heir at law of bis deceased mother, claims a one-half interest in tbe tract of land described in tbe complaint. It is alleged in tbe complaint that in 1893, whilst tbe plaintiff’s mother and P. S. Stalcup were husband and wife, P. S. Stal- cup bought with the money of his own and his wife the land, and took a bond for title in his own name; that the bond for title ought to have been so executed as that one-half of the land should be conveyed to the plaintiff’s mother and the other half to P. S. Stalcup, but that when the bond was drawn afid executed,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bruce v. . NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Ray v. Long.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Moore v. Greenville Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Highsmith v. . PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Eason v. . EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Isley v. . SellarsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  5. Murchison v. . FoglemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API