Isley v. . Sellars
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from C. Q. Lyon, J., at the September Term, 1910, of AlamaNCe. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
"Walker, J".
This is a controversy between the plaintiff and the defendant, administrator of her deceased husband, as to their respective rights in a certain fund of twenty-five hundred dollars, which is a part of the proceeds of the sale of land. It appears that A. A. Isley and W. 0. Isley were seised, as tenants in common, share and share alike, of a tract of land, and A. A. Isley conveyed his interest, “the same being one moiety,” to the plaintiff during the lifetime of her husband, W. G. Isley. Afterwards ~W. 0. Isley and his wife sold and conveyed a part of the land to the North Carolina…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hiles v. . FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Bruce v. . NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Long v. . BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- Den Ex D. Motley v. . WhitemoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1837
- Miner v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Davis v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Moore v. Greenville Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Godman v. GreerOrphan's Court of Delaware · 1918
- Highsmith v. . PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Richardson v. Richardson, Admr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.