Legal Opinion

Rice v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1930No. Docket No. 119, Calendar No. 34,795PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, C. J.

This is an action upon a claimed oral renewal of a $2,000 burglary insurance policy upon an open stock of merchandise. Plaintiff had recovery, and defendant reviews by writ of error.

In January, 1921, and for many years previous thereto, plaintiff was a merchant tailor with an establishment on Woodward avenue, in the city of Detroit. For the year ending January 29, 1921, he was insured in the sum of $2,000, by defendant, against loss or damage to his merchandise occasioned by the felonious taking thereof from his place of business. Just before the expiration of the insurance, plaintiff added…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hurley v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Spalding v. LoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Theisen v. Detroit Taxicab & Transfer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Fisher v. KyleMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Koehler v. AbeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. DellabondaMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. People v. HobsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Germiquet v. HubbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Brown v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  5. Guardian Depositors Corp. v. KellerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API