Legal Opinion

McCullough v. Stepp

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 22, 1954No. 35218PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, C. J.

The indorsement in and of itself was not a qualified indorsement. Code § 14-409 provides: “A qualified indorsement constitutes the indorser a mere assignor of the title to the instrument. It may be made by adding- to the indorser’s signature the words, ‘without recourse’, or any words of similar import-. . .” The words, “I hereby transfer my right to this note over to W. E. McCullough,” are not words of similar import to “without recourse.” Hurt v. Wiley, 18 Ga. App. 420 (2) (89 S. E. 494); 10 C. J. S. 703, § 214; 8 Am. Jur. 61, § 325; Fay v. Witte, 262 N. Y. 215 (186 N. E. 678); Britton’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Meador v. Dollar Savings BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  2. Fay v. WitteNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Chandler v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  4. Odom Realty Co. v. Central Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  5. Hurt v. WileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Northeast Factor & Discount Co. v. Mortgage Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  2. Coulter v. StewartArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Yates v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API