Legal Opinion
BINKS v. US TECH SOLUTIONS
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 12, 2020No. 2:20-cv-02969Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY HANNAH BINKS, Case No. 20–cv–02969–KM–ESK Plaintiff, v. OPINION AND ORDER US TECH SOLUTIONS, Defendant. KIEL, U.S.M.J. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the motion of defendant U.S. Tech Solutions, Inc., improperly pleaded as “US Tech Solutions,” (Tech Solutions) to dismiss for improper venue pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (Rule) 12(b)(3) (Motion).1 (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff Hannah Binks opposes the Motion. (ECF No. 10.) For the following reasons, the Motion is DENIED. However, in lieu of dismissal, this case will be transferred…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Lafferty v. St. RielCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- James v. Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Johnson v. Deloitte Services, LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- de Rojas v. Trans States Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2001