State ex rel. Wolyn v. Apalachicola Northern Railroad

In the former opinion in this case, applying the rule that a demurrer to an alternative writ admits as true all such matters of fact as are well pleaded, it was held, assuming the allegations of the alternative writ to *396be true, that there was no proper basis in fact for the rule and notice of the respondent State Plant Board in so far as it effected the area in which the Japanese seed cane of relator was located and that such rule and notice was therefore no sufficient ground for the refusal of the respondent railroad company to place a car as requested by relator for receiving his Japanese…