Mulligan v. City of Hollywood
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
871 So.2d 249 (2003)
Colon Bernard MULLIGAN, Appellant,
v.
CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, Appellee.
No. 4D02-3626.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
October 1, 2003.
Order Denying Rehearing and Granting Certification May 12, 2004.
Ronald S. Guralnick, Miami, for appellant.
Daniel Abbott, City Attorney, and Robert Oldershaw, Chief Litigation Counsel, Hollywood, for appellee.
FARMER, C.J.
Today we consider the extent of municipal powers by ordinance to seize personal property used in the commission of a crime. In so doing, we also address whether a city's willingness to restore the property it has…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited41 opinions
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bennis v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Department of Law Enf. v. Real PropertySupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Singletary v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Hollywood v. MulliganSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- City of Miami v. WellmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- City of Tampa v. McAfeeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Gaudet v. BoardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- City of Miami v. JuarezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.