Legal Opinion

Stein-Hall Manufacturing Co. v. Glossbrenner & Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1924No. 11,853PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, P. J.

It is averred in the complaint in this action, briefly stated, that appellees William B. and Gerda .Stein and Frank G. Hall were at the time of the alleged contract in suit copartners doing business under the firm name of “Stein-Hall and Company,” with their principal place of business in Chicago, Illinois. On September 16, 1918, appellee company telegraphed to said copartners as follows: “Wire price car rice flour * * *” and said copartners, on September 17, 1918, in answer to said wire, telegraphed the appellee company as follows: “Offer car rice flour 9 cents net, Chicago, shipment about…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Caha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Daniels v. TearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Indiana Natural Gas & Oil Co. v. O'BrienIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Goode v. Elwood Lodge No. 166Indiana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Jeffersonville Water Supply Co. v. RiterIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. St. Louis Public Service Company v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. Wells v. Indianapolis Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API