Legal Opinion
Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 6, 1938No. 2534PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CFIESNUT, Distritt Judge.
This case involves a construction of the legal papers constituting the Refunding Plan of 1933-4 affecting mortgages guaranteed by the Maryland Casualty Company. It arises from an interpleader suit in equity in which the Reconstruction Finance Corporation has paid into court the sum of $16,808.76 which is claimed by the Maryland Casualty Company and the Continental Debenture Corporation respectively. By order of court the Maryland Casualty Company has been designated the plaintiff and the Continental Debenture Corporation the defendant for-the second stage of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Ruhlin v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hardaway v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Orem v. WrightsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Security Insurance Co. of New Haven v. ManganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- H. Max Ammerman v. Lou MillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973