Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Viering

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 1, 1934No. 2351PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*344OPINION

By STEVENS, J.

The specifications of error will be considered in the order of their presentation.

It is claimed by counsel for plaintiff that the trial court in the instant case refused to follow the law laid down by the Court of Appeals in the first review of this cause when said trial court in this action declined to give the special requests which were given at the first hearing and charged contrary thereto on the measure of. damages, and that thereby error intervened. Gohman v City of St. Bernard, 111 Oh St 726, is cited as supporting this contention.

It is urged that, because, in the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hawley v. RitleyOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Stemen v. ShibleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Thatcher v. SowardsOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Kolosai v. AzemOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API