SMI Investors, Inc. v. Planning Board
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
In 1973 the plaintiff’s predecessors in title (the Chiras) were granted a special permit by the Tisbury board of appeals to develop their 107-acre tract bordering on Lake Tashmoo as a cluster development. The planning board disapproved the subdivision plan, however, on the ground that the proposed 150-dwelling unit development exceeded the density requirement of a 1973 amendment to the zoning by-law (50,000 square feet per lot). Litigation followed, as a result of which a judge of the Superior Court ruled, in favor of the Chiras, that the applicable density requirement was that in effect…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Purity Supreme, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Gifford v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Arrigo v. Planning Board of FranklinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- Fairbairn v. Planning Board of BarnstableMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
- VAZZA PROPERTIES, INC v. City Council of WoburnMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stefanick v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
- Campbell v. City Council of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Hamilton v. Planning Board of BeverlyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
- Cricones v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
- Campbell v. City Council of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993