Legal Opinion

SMI Investors, Inc. v. Planning Board

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 30, 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

In 1973 the plaintiff’s predecessors in title (the Chiras) were granted a special permit by the Tisbury board of appeals to develop their 107-acre tract bordering on Lake Tashmoo as a cluster development. The planning board disapproved the subdivision plan, however, on the ground that the proposed 150-dwelling unit development exceeded the density requirement of a 1973 amendment to the zoning by-law (50,000 square feet per lot). Litigation followed, as a result of which a judge of the Superior Court ruled, in favor of the Chiras, that the applicable density requirement was that in effect…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Purity Supreme, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Gifford v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Arrigo v. Planning Board of FranklinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  4. Fairbairn v. Planning Board of BarnstableMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
  5. VAZZA PROPERTIES, INC v. City Council of WoburnMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stefanick v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  2. Campbell v. City Council of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  3. Hamilton v. Planning Board of BeverlyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  4. Cricones v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  5. Campbell v. City Council of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API