Legal Opinion

United States v. The James G. Swan

District Court, D. Washington

Decided March 26, 1892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANFORD, District Judge.

Fur seals in great numbers habitually make annual visits to the Pribilof islands, in Bering sea, affording to the native inhabitants their means of living, the flesh of the animals being their principal article of food, and seal-skins being the only commodity of commercial value obtainable by their industry. Previous to the acquisition of Alaska by our government, the preservation of these animals from indiscriminate slaughter and extermination was by the Russian government deemed necessary for the subsistence of said inhabitants, and accordingly authority over all of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Gelston v. HoytSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  3. Williams v. Suffolk InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  4. Garcia v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  5. Kennett v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1852

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Alaska Packers' Ass'nU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1897
  2. United States v. HoltU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Washington · 1909
  3. United States v. The KodiakDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1892
  4. United States v. The AlexanderDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1894
  5. Maul v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API