Legal Opinion

Baltimore & O. R. v. Tindall

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 9, 1931No. 4439PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

Accepting the testimony most favorable to appellee, as we are required to do when reviewing the refusal of the trial court to direct a verdict, the following facts are disclosed :

Tindall was a front brakeman working on one of appellant’s freight trains engaged in interstate commerce, and he had been so employed for some time. As such employee, it was his duty to ride in the engine cab between stations. A seat was provided for him, the construction of which is shown by the drawing:

On October 29, 1927, while appellee was so riding between two stations, the seat gave way and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. New York Central Railroad v. AmbroseSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. De Donato v. WellsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Bos v. RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
  4. Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API