Legal Opinion

Russell v. Deere & Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 29, 2003No. 99-01427-CV; A114045PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

This appeal arises out of a product liability action involving a defective combine. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant Deere & Company on the ground that plaintiff had not presented evidence sufficient to create a jury question as to whether the combine was unreasonably dangerous to persons or property. See ORS 30.920. In reviewing plaintiffs challenge to that ruling on appeal, we view the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiff, along with all reasonable inferences flowing from those facts, and uphold the judgment if there is no genuine issue of material…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Heaton v. Ford Motor Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Holcomb v. SunderlandOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. McCathern v. Toyota Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Owens v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Phelps v. Wyeth, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013
  2. Benson Tower Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Victaulic Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
  3. Chong v. STL International, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2016
  4. Harris v. SunigaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. Albers v. Deere & Co.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API