Legal Opinion

Zorach v. Lenox Oil Co.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided January 23, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGelinas, J.

Appellant Lenox Oil Company, Inc. (defendant) urges reversal of a trial court justice’s denial of its motion to vacate judgment of default,1, dated May 5, 1994, claiming that the judgment is void for failure of proper service under Dist/Mun. Cts. R. Civ. R, Rule 4(c).

We affirm the trial court’s decision denying the motion to vacate judgment of default and dismiss the report (the second report) but vacate the judgment amount and order hearing under Dist./Mun. Cts. R. Civ. R, Rule 55(b)(2) on the issue of damages.2 We further dismiss defendant’s report of denial of motion to remove default,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Farley v. SpragueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Productora E Importadora De Papel v. FlemingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Bushnell v. BushnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. Plasko v. OrserMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. Konan v. CarrollMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. KPS & Associates, Inc. v. Designs by FMC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  2. Chaput v. ScafidiSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
  3. Fried v. Wellesley MazdaMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010
  4. IAG Federal Credit Union v. FrippMassachusetts Superior Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API