People v. Barksdale
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that his confession was involun*532tarily obtained is without merit. This detailed oral account of his spree of burglaries and sexual attacks was offered after the defendant was at least twice advised of his constitutional rights by two different police officers, and after he once himself read the card upon which these rights were printed. He then signed and dated this card. This was clearly an effective waiver of his rights, including his right to remain silent. His subsequent refusal to sign the transcript of his confession did not render invalid his prior knowing,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Connecticut v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- People v. GagneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. LeftwichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. RosatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. AnthonyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.