Legal Opinion

Claim of Ritton v. AT&T—New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 31, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCardona, P.J.

Appeal from that part of an amended decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed June 25, 2001, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was entitled to workers’ compensation benefits at the mild to moderate disability rate.

In June 1993, claimant filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits while working as a telephone and video display terminal operator. Occupational disease, notice and causal relationship were originally established for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome in claimant’s hands and later amended to include myofacial pain syndrome, thoracic outlet and injuries relating to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of Forte v. City & SuburbanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Claim of Hughes v. Indian Valley Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Claim of Harrington v. L.C. Whitford Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Claim of Gordon v. Green Bus Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Claim of Winns v. Local 1199 Health & Human Services Employees UnionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. In re the Claim of Raub v. Cutler Hammer, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API