Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Copeland

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 23, 1904PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Before DantzlER, J., Laurens, September, 1903. Action by L. H. Davidson against E. W. Copeland. Prom order of reference, defendant appeals. cite: Code of Proc., 292; 43 S. E., 311. cites: 34 S. C., 175; 58 S. C., 463; 25 S. C., 119; 65 S. C., 573.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

This action is in equity, but its nature is not disclosed by the “Case” before us. By consent, it was referred to L. W. Simkins, Esq., as special referee, to hear and determine all the issues. The referee made his report, and when it came on to be heard, the defendant made a motion to have the cause recommitted for the purpose of having certain testimony corrected and to take additional testimony. The motion was granted by Judge Gage, who made an order, dated October 23, 1901, referring it to L. W. Simkins, Esq., as special referee,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1891
  2. Simms v. PhillipsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
  3. Barnwell v. MarionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
  4. Muckenfuss v. FishburneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  5. Heyward v. MiddletonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte TownesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API