Legal Opinion
Rotkowski v. Arkansas Rehabilitation Services
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided April 13, 2016No. CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03085PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
TIMOTHY L. BROOKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court are Defendants Arkansas Rehabilitation Services’ and Alan McClain’s (together, “ARS”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 20) and Plaintiff Teresa Rotkowski’s Response in Opposition (Doc. 22). For the reasons stated herein, Defendants’ Motion is DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
The facts recited herein are detailed in the light most favorable to Rotkowski, and are limited in scope to what is necessary to adjudicate the pending motion. ARS is a state agency that provides career and education services to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Call v. CordovaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2021
- McCrae v. H.N.S. Management CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Whitesell v. FMS Financial Management Services, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020