Legal Opinion

Hardesty v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 28, 1967No. 9300PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

Appellants, having obtained judgments in the state courts of Oklahoma against Fred Ennis, Jr., seek to impose liability upon the appellee insurance company for partial payment of such judgments in the sum of $20,000 pursuant to the terms of an automobile liability policy issued to Fred Ennis, Sr. and covering, in addition to Ennis, Sr., as named insured, any relative of the named insured “who is a *565resident of the same household.” The determinative issue is whether Ennis, Jr. was a resident of his father’s household at the time of the accident giving rise to liability.

In…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. L. H. Young v. C. L. Vincent, D/B/A Vincent Trucking Company, Ennis Lee Hemphill, and Superior Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  3. Hardesty v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Floyd Hardesty v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API