Legal Opinion

State v. Ward

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 5, 1997No. COA96-1205PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.

On or about 1 March 1996 criminal summonses issued for defendants Roger Ward, Joel Shirley and Timothy Harvell (hereinafter collectively referred to as “defendants”), indicating that there was probable cause to believe that defendants “did unlawfully, willfully did [sic] promote and participate in a pyramid [scheme].” Defendants subsequently filed a “Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, Motion to Remove Prosecutor/Motion to Suppress,” wherein they argued that prosecutorial misconduct warranted dismissal of the charges against them, or alternatively, the appointment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. McCoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. BillupsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. State v. HinchmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. State v. LeskiwCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. Clark v. City of Winston-SalemNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2003
  5. State v. MeadCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API