Legal Opinion · Dissent

Carpenter v. Smith

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1985No. Docket 78377, 79279Published

1DissentB. A. Jasper, J.

I respectfully dissent. Today, the lead opinion applies the doctrine of anticipatory breach to a land contract foreclosure proceeding and thus permits the circuit court to accelerate the installment payments not yet due under the parties’ contract to purchase real estate in Genesee County.

The foreclosure of land contracts is governed by statute. See MCL 600.3103 et seq.; MSA 27A.3101 et seq. Under Chapter 31 of the Revised Judicature Act, there is no provision for the doctrine of anticipatory breach. On the contrary, the act provides that a complaint in foreclosure "shall be dismissed upon…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hosmer v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Lutz v. DutmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Obenauer v. SolomonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Dumas v. HelmMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Cady v. TaggartMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API