Legal Opinion
Hudson Foam Latex Products, Inc. v. Aiken
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 10, 1964PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
82 N.J. Super. 508 (1964)
198 A.2d 136
HUDSON FOAM LATEX PRODUCTS, INC., HUDSON CHEMICAL CORPORATION, HUDSON FOAM PLASTICS CORPORATION AND HUDSON CUSH-N-FOAM CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
MEYER C. AIKEN AND NOPCO CHEMICAL COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 17, 1964.
Decided March 10, 1964.
Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and SULLIVAN.
Mr. Burtis W. Horner argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Clifford J. Sheehan, on the brief; Messrs. Stryker, Tams & Dill, attorneys).
Mr. Willard G. Woelper argued the cause…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sun Dial Corp. v. RideoutSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- A. Hollander & Son, Inc. v. Imperial Fur Blending Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Trenton Potteries Co. v. OliphantSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
- Taylor Iron & Steel Co. v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
- Sun Dial Corp. v. RideoutNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ehlers v. Iowa Warehouse CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- Solari Industries, Inc. v. MaladySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. CiavattaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Baker v. StarkeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Adp, LLC v. Nicole Rafferty Adp, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.