Legal Opinion

Jose R. Aroca v. Tang Investment

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 2025No. CV-24-0049-PRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA JOSE R. AROCA AND KIRSTIN AROCA, HUSBAND AND WIFE, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. TANG INVESTMENT COMPANY LLC, AN ARIZONA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Defendant/Appellee. No. CV-24-0049-PR Filed March 31, 2025 Appeal from the Superior Court in Pinal County The Honorable Christopher J. O’Neil, Judge No. S1100CV202200940 REVERSED AND REMANDED Opinion of the Court of Appeals, Division Two

257 Ariz. 75

(App. 2024) VACATED IN PART COUNSEL: Robert S. Porter (argued), Porter Law Firm, Phoenix, Attorneys for Tang Investment Company, LLC Trevor J. Fish (argued),…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Kotterman v. KillianArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America v. CraigArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Tracy v. WheelerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Valley Drive-In Theatre Corp. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API