Legal Opinion

Hohri v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 11, 1988No. 87-1635PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal comes to this court following the decision of the Supreme Court in United States v. Hohri, 482 U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 2246, 96 L.Ed.2d 51 (1987) (vacating judgment of District of Columbia Circuit and remanding with instructions to transfer to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631 (1982)). In Hohri, the Supreme Court held that a case which presents both a nontax claim under the “Little Tucker Act,” 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2) (1982), and a claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b) (1982), as here, may be appealed only to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. HohriSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Hohri v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Richard A. Banks v. H. Lawrence Garrett, Iii, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. Gollehon Farming v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  3. Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  4. In Re EzakiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
  5. Banks v. GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API