Mertens v. Hewitt Associates
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs, former employees of Kaiser Steel Corporation (“Kaiser”) and participants in its ERISA qualified pension plan, brought this action against the plan’s actuary, Hewitt Associates (“Hewitt”), for ERISA-based and pendent state claims. The district court dismissed all of the plaintiffs’ claims and entered judgment in favor of Hewitt. We affirm the district court’s dismissal of the ERISA-based claims, but reverse its dismissal of the pendent state law claim.
*609FACTS
On a motion to dismiss, all material allegations in the complaint must be taken as true and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. LTV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- 19 Employee Benefits Cas. 1441, Pens. Plan Guide P 23909g Robert B. Reich, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor v. Fred Compton, Joseph McHugh John Nielsen, Frederick Hammerschmidt, Gersil N. Kay, Electrical Mechanics Association, the Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Company, and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 98Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Glaziers & Glassworkers Union Local 252 Annuity Fund v. Newbridge Securities, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Fechter v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Mertens v. Kaiser Steel Retirement PlanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1992
- Hill v. Opus Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.