Legal Opinion
Mary Ruth Parrish v. Immanuel Medical Center
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided September 13, 1996No. 95-3514PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEAM, Circuit Judge.
Mary Ruth Parrish brought suit against Immanuel Medical Center (Immanuel) alleging discrimination based on age and disability in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and the Nebraska Fair Employment Practice Act (NFEPA), Neb.Rev.Stat. § 48-1101 et seq. A jury awarded Parrish $21,-218.15 in compensatory damages. Based on the jury’s finding that Immanuel willfully violated the ADEA, the district court 1 determined that Parrish was entitled to liquidated damages and accordingly entered final judgment for Parrish in the amount…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Siegfried Herrnreiter v. Chicago Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Ronald J. Fenney v. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Company, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus on Behalf of TheCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Peggy Kimzey, Cross-Appellant/appellee v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Marvin L. Fisher v. Pharmacia & UpjohnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Janet R. Kerns v. Capital Graphics, Inc., Doing Business as Clarinda CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.