Legal Opinion
Yerxa v. Youngman
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 15, 1922PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
Henry D. Yerxa died January 21, 1919. He left a will and codicil which were duly admitted to probate. Surviving him were a son, Herbert E. Yerxa, and three daughters, Sarah E. Yerxa, Helen I. Youngman and Marion S. Barnard. Said Herbert E., named in the will and codicil of his father, was appointed trustee in February,- 1919, and as such became the holder of three thousand shares of the common stock of the Cobb, Bates and Yerxa Company, one thousand shares of which were held for the benefit of Sarah E. Yerxa, and by the terms of her father’s will, “said stock [to] be transferred to whomsoever…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lavery v. EganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Shattuck v. BurrageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Harmon v. WestonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Sherburne v. HowlandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Fiske v. FiskeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pitman v. PitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Tyler v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Dexter v. DexterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Seavey v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Gustafson v. SvensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.