Legal Opinion

Monk v. Veillon

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1975No. 4966PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOTION TO STRIKE

WATSON, Judge.

The plaintiff-appellant, Andrew J. Monk, Jr., moves to strike the answer to the appeal filed by the defendants, Willie Chais-son and Joe Veillon on the grounds that under plaintiff’s limited appeal the defendants may not seek a modification of the judgment by means of an answer to the appeal. We deny the motion.

The facts, pertinent to a‘decision in this matter, are as follows: Plaintiff-appellant filed this suit in tort. Named as defendants were Willie Chaisson, Joe Veillon, James E. Wimberly and Western World Insurance Company, the insurer of Wimberly. Judgment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Shreveport v. KahnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  2. Warren v. Fidelity Mutual Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Alengi v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  4. Glass v. HolomonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Milner v. Louisiana Public UtilitiesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Borne v. Mike Persia Chevrolet Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Giroir v. TheriotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API