Legal Opinion

In re J.V.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 2012No. 2011-0107Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as In re J.V., 134 Ohio St.3d 1,

2012-Ohio-4961.] IN RE J.V. [Cite as In re J.V., 134 Ohio St.3d 1,

2012-Ohio-4961.] Juvenile offenders—Invocation of adult portion of blended sentence—R.C. 2152.14(E)—Judicial fact-finding constitutional—Standard of proof. (No. 2011-0107—Submitted December 7, 2011—Decided October 30, 2012.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 94820,

2010-Ohio-5490. __________________ PFEIFER, J. Factual and Procedural Background {¶ 1} In June 2005, pursuant to a plea agreement, the trial court found juvenile appellant J.V. delinquent and guilty of one…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API