Townsley v. Marion County Department of Child Services
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SULLIVAN, Judge.
Appellant, Cleveland Townsley 1 (“Father”), challenges the juvenile court’s order determining his child, C.T., to be a child in need of services (“CHINS”). Upon appeal, Father challenges the CHINS adjudication by claiming that the admission of child hearsay evidence during the hearing did not comport with the requirements of Indiana Code § 31-34-13-3 (Burns Code Ed. Repl.2003), and that in light of this inadmissible evidence, there was insufficient evidence to support the CHINS adjudication. 2
We reverse and remand.
C.T. was born on October 7, 1996 and was eight years old…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lannan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Stewart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Mayes v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- Fletcher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
- Perry-Worth Concerned Citizens v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Tayler F.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- L.H. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- LH v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Louisa Rasheed v. Indiana Department of ChildCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Louisa Rasheed v. Indiana Department of ChildCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.