Legal Opinion

Burns v. City of Fairmont

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1890PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to the district court for Fillmore county. Tried below before Morris, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

The plaintiff, Joseph Burns, brought this action to recover the sum of $656, claimed as a balance due him from the city of Fairmont on the following contract:

“Lincoln, Neb., Jan. 12, 1887.
“ To the Mon. Mayor and City Council of Fairmont, Neb.: Gentlemen — I herewith hand you a proposal to furnish your city a water supply of (6400) sixty-four hundred gallons or (200) two hundred barrels of water per hour for (24) twenty-four consecutive hours’ pumping, and I guarantee that said supply shall hold good for (6) six days, commencing my work in the bottom of your well now dug and walled up, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mathews v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Fitzgerald v. FitzgeraldNebraska Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ford v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Western Home Insurance v. RichardsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Smith v. HitchcockNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Cortelyou v. MabenNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Murry v. HennesseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API