Legal Opinion
Christensen v. Ward
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 3, 1990No. Nos. 89-4099, 89-4100PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
We have considered the response to the order to show cause issued June 29, 1990. 916 F.2d 1462. Sanctions are imposed as follows: (1) Double costs are awarded in favor of the United States. The clerk shall issue an amended statement of costs. (2) Mr. Christensen is prohibited from filing any complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Utah or any appeal in this court that contains the same or similar allegations to the ones set forth in his complaints and other pleadings in the cases at bar (including any direct or indirect challenge to the previous court proceedings or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Irwin Schiff v. Simon & Schuster, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Charles W. And Marlene D. Stelly v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Zerman v. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mann v. BoatrightCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Maxwell, Lawrence v. Snow, JohnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Merrigan v. Affiliated Bankshares of Colorado, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
- Arrowhead v. Picture ProCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2026
- Depew v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.